Tony Blair Destroyed Britain’s Faith In The Benefits System, Claim Researchers

photo credit: Center for American Progress via photopin cc

Researchers have managed to pinpoint the exact moment in history when public support for Britain’s benefits system began to wane.

According to research published today from the University of Bristol, public attitude toward unemployed people began to harden after Tony Blair announced the New Deal programme for jobseekers in 1999, declaring welfare should be a “hand up, not a hand down”.

Before this time negative comments against the welfare state by a Labour leader would have been regarded as unthinkable, and perhaps unLabour-like. Tony Blair’s took Labour to the right under the guise of ‘New Labour’ and the rest,.. as they say, is history.

Researchers claim that during the 1980’s and most of the 1990’s the majority of people believed that benefit payments were too low, causing severe hardship among the poorest in society, and should be increased.

However, after 1999 a growing number of people adopted the view that benefits were too generous and should be cut. It was around this time that a resurgence in the derogatory ‘scrounger’ rhetoric, more akin to Dickensian Britain, began to resurface and has continued ever-since.

The number of people who agree that the government should be responsible for ensuring unemployed people have enough to live on has fallen to 59%, according to the latest British Social Attitudes Survey.

In 1991, 26% agreed that if benefits were less generous people would ‘stand on their own two feet’. By 2007 this figure had doubled to 52% and now stands at 54%.

Only three-in-ten now believe that benefits are too low and should be increased, compared to three-quarters in 1998 – just one year before ‘New Deal’.

In 1998, three-quarters (74%) wanted to see more spending on benefits for disabled people, compared with 63% in 2008 and just 53% in 2011.

Support for the welfare state has also declined among Labour voters. Around 73% of Labour voters were supportive of Britain’s benefits system in 1987, compared to just 36% in 2011.

Dr Chris Deeming of the University of Bristol said:

“Attitudes towards unemployed people are clearly changing and hardening fast. Solidarity with unemployed citizens, poor people and welfare claimants has declined significantly in recent times”.

Dr Deeming said more people in Britain now see unemployed people as being ‘lazy’ or ‘workshy’ – the language of the right-wing press.

“The British public now sees work aversion and the declining work ethic as one of the main issues facing society. Coupled with this trend is a growing belief that out-of-work benefits are now too generous and act to promote the ‘dependency culture’”, he said.

Public understanding about benefits if often far from the reality. A poll by Ipsos Mori in 2013 revealed that 29% of the British public believed that the UK spends more on Jobseeker’s Allowance (JSA) than pensions. In reality we spend 15 times more on pensions than JSA.

The public also believe that £24 out of every £100 spent on benefits is claimed fraudulently, compared with official estimates of £0.70 per £100.


photo credit: Center for American Progress via photopin cc



  1. It is because the majority of people are dumbed down and can't think for themselves, also down to people who are in work have had their wages go down and rights taken, so they are told to blame it on the unemployed and disabled by the right wing press and government, the retards like picking on the little man when they don't have the guts to point the finger at the real perpetrators.

  2. Just out of curiosity, do benefits claimants have more or less disposable income now than they did in the 1970s and 1980s? I suspect that what has happened is that we now have a very much more unfair system. In particular owner-occupiers get little or no support when they need it, whilst astronomical amounts in housing benefit are paid to private tenants. It sounds like claimants are getting a lot of money, but actually the person getting the "benefit" of this pay-out is their landlord.

  3. They have to blame to victims of the bankers because they need the money to pay the bankers for their crimes. The master plan is for the bankers to gain as much of the assets as they can from the West and the distracting view presented by the media they own is to distract us all from this operation. Most people will only wake up to the reality when their bank accounts are bailed in and their building society accounts capital levied or when the currencies collapse and turn into the paper they already are. The wealth transfer is in progress, when it is finished we will all be allowed to start again….

  4. Most people are sympathetic with the Bedroom Tax , which is a relief, even the present day hawkish Labour party, so when policies go too far theirs still a defence of the welfare system

    • I don't understand your sentence – who are these 'most' people. The bedroom tax is another distraction that you've fallen for – it costs us more money to implement than not and is really another Poor Tax. Get with it.

  5. ah I remember well tb being put into office yet that very moment learning of his win was going to see mt his other mother it seems they taking the party so far right is it possible to come back left but benefits have dropped they just tell you they haven't has posted below who gets the lion share landlords and council tax I they our elected need to tell the truth but then how can one tell porkies without laughing but sadly to many think this lot tell the truth and those on benefits are lording it up wishfull thinking sadly jeff3

  6. ‘stand on their own two feet’ It's a shame the Banks couldn't, They required the poor's shoulders to stand upon. The poor of this country bailed out the rich, not next time because there is nothing left down here.

Comments are closed.