close

635,000 Sign New ‘JSA Claimant Commitment’ As Arbitrary Sanctions Continue To Hit Jobless

no thumb

Figures released by the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP), and collated from the Labour Market System (LMS), show that a total of 635,000 jobseeker’s signed the new Claimant Commitment pledge between 14 October 2013 and 11 April 2014.

The Jobseeker’s Allowance (JSA) Claimant Commitment was launched by the coalition government in October 2013 and described as “the start of a redefinition of the relationship between the welfare state and claimants”, by the then Employment Minister Esther McVey.

Under the new regime jobseeker’s are required to sign a claimant commitment, or work plan, to “agree regular specific tasks and training opportunities and the penalties claimants could face for failing to meet their responsibilities to get into work will be clearly spelt out”.

These ‘tasks’ could include agreeing to apply for a certain number of jobs each week, taking part in ‘training opportunities’, furthering their education and other ‘tasks’ set out in a personal work plan.

The DWP say that a total of 26,300 Jobcentre staff have been trained to deliver the new JSA Claimant Commitment with the majority of those being in central England and London area’s.

Unemployed people on Universal Credit are also required to sign a claimant commitment as a means of supporting them back into work ‘at the earliest opportunity’.

The new JSA Claimant Commitment has been partly blamed for a shocking 60 per cent rise in the number of jobseeker’s having their benefits sanctions; where a claimant can see their benefits cut or stopped completely for weeks, months or even years for failure to adhere to the jobseeker’s agreement.

Far from helping unemployed people back into work, the Citizens Advice Bureau say benefit sanctions can create  barrier to employment.

Citizens Advice Chief Executive, Gillian Guy, said:

“People need a system that can take into account their situation, set suitable work search requirements and where necessary apply sanctions at a level that won’t limit their chances of employment.

“Whilst it is vital that people receiving taxpayers’ support do their utmost to find work, the model needs to work and not make it harder for claimants to find a job.”

Young people have been hit particularly hard by the new JSA Claimant Commitment and subsequent benefit sanctions.

Despite only making up 27 per cent of all JSA claimants, young people have received 43 per cent of all benefit sanctions dished out by sometimes overzealous Jobcentre staff.

Perhaps even more shocking are the DWP statistics which show 38,969 of these decisions were later overturned following an appeal.

Many jobseeker’s, particularly young people, say they do not understand why their benefits were sanctioned, despite having signed the JSA Claimant Commitment.

Some sanctions have been for what most people would regard as ridiculous reasons: such as failing to turn up for a Jobcentre appointment despite already informing staff that they were attending a job interview.

Benefit sanctions, and the JSA Claimant Commitment, have also been blamed for a 163 per cent surge in the number of people turning to food banks in the past year.

Around 31 per cent of those who had been referred for food parcels from the Trussell Trust say their benefit payments had been delayed, mainly due the draconian sanctions regime introduced by the coalition government.

The Trussell Trust Chairman, Chris Mould, said:

“In the last year we’ve seen things get worse, rather than better, for many people on low-incomes. It’s been extremely tough for a lot of people, with parents not eating properly in order to feed their children and more people than ever experiencing seemingly unfair and harsh benefits sanctions.

“Unless there is determined policy action to ensure that the benefits of national economic recovery reach people on low-incomes we won’t see life get better for the poorest anytime soon.

A more thoughtful approach to the administration of the benefits regime and sanctions in particular, increasing the minimum wage, introducing the living wage and looking at other measures such as social tariffs for essentials like energy would help to address the problem of UK hunger.”

Tags : Benefit SanctionsBenefitsDWPFood banksFood povertyGovernmentJSANewsPoliticsReformSocietyUK newsUnemploymentWelfare Reform
  • Big Bill

    Am I right in thinking these new Cklaimant Commitments have no basis in law and are unenforcable? http://skwalker1964.wordpress.com/2014/03/11/most-jobseeker-agreements-ruled-unlawful-and-the-dwp-doesnt-care/

  • james

    Here’s hoping Big Bill . I refused to sign and was told that I would have my payments suspended, I thought ok I am still not going to sign and wrote a short statement basically saying that I did not understand either cognitively or stand under in legal terms the terms and conditions of the pre-printed back page,which looked to me at least to asking me to agree to replacing the Parliamentary 1995 jobseekers act with my own contract between myself and the DWP. As flawed as Parliament is, I said I would rather stick with the old law that has been “scruitinised” by Parliament. I was telephoned a few days later to say that the decision maker had allowed my payment to go through on the basis that I had an existing contract with the DWP and this was not a new claim. I am Work Programme returnee ( they got zero from me too because I never signed the data protection waivers ) Anyway I was told on one hand that my existing contract stopped me from being sanctioned , however could I sign a new contract made up by myself !!! Sounds good at first but , wait for it, the whole basis of this is about fluidity and once I sign the t&c’s will be subject to an arbitrary process of ever changing rules. I politely became evasive and smell a bag of rats here and will not sign this individual contract with the DWP, as it seems like I am waiving my rights under the JSA act 1995 to enter into an “fluid” contract. The whole thing seems to rest on the My Work plan booklet which is not a condition for receiving JSA as stated in FOI request jan 2013.
    INTERESTING READING
    https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/my_work_plan
    P.S I have just filled out 3 very lengthy and detailed applications this week and I am just about to start on my fourth and I have got not time to fill in these booklets, especially as they are a low tech surveillance tool after the total bawz up of UJM !